메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
최명덕 (건국대학교)
저널정보
호서사학회 역사와 담론 역사와 담론 第55輯
발행연도
2010.4
수록면
237 - 267 (31page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study examines the controversial understanding on circumcision between the Greco Roman world and the Jewish world. The Greeks and the Romans had a strong negative perception against the Jewish circumcision. Jews viewed their circumcision as a holy covenantal action between God and man so that they considered the mark on their penis as divine signature of God. However, the Greeks and the Romans considered the Jewish circumcision simply a mutilation of the body and an uneducated barbarian custom. Analysis on the writings of Greek and Roman writers such as Herodotus, Hacataeous, Diodorus, Tacitus, Satiricon, Persius, Domitianus and so on shows their negative understanding on circumcision and antisemitic attitude against the Jews due to their Greco Roman cultural code.
Greek vase paintings and Greco Roman statues frequently show the ideal shape of the penis and the beauty of male genital aesthetics. Those pictures and the statues show the ideal shape of the prepuce in ancient Greece and Rome. The Greeks valued the longer prepuce for a ideal penis and they enjoyed the aesthetic preference for the longer, tapered prepuce. That was a reflection of a deeper ethos involving Greco Roman cultural identity and morality. It was a great shame for them to expose the glen in public while they wrestle or do other sport activities. In order to prevent the exposure of the glen with their naked activities they fastened the end of the prepuce with the thin leather and draw their penis upon the bottom of the lower stomach and tie the leather around the waist. That leather made device was called kynodesme. With kynodesme the glen was secured inside the prepuce so that they were able to prevent the exposure of the glen in public. Accordingly, the violation of this ethos was prohibited. Thus it was a full mockery if one is found with exposed glen in public in the Gymnasium. Josephus the Jewish historian in the 1st century reported there were Jews who had surgery recovering the prepuce in order to hide the glen while they were naked. The book of Maccabeus and the book of Jubilee also witness that it was popular among Jews who hide their circumcision in order to meet the cultural code of the Greco Roman world at that time.
However, the rabbinic writings witnesses that the Jews set the new regulations for the circumcision which is called periah. With the practice of periah they were able to avoid the restoration surgery of the prepuce among Jews. They cut the prepuce deep into the penis and tear the skin of the prepuce with their thumb nail or with the sharp object so that no Jews would have th restoration prepuce surgery later.
The reconciliation between two cultures on the issue of circumcision never have accomplished throughout the ages up to now. Different cultural code between two people produced a controversial cultural interpretation on the same subject through out the ages.

목차

1. 들어가는 말
2. 할례에 대한 유대인의 인식
3. 할례에 대한 그리스-로마의 인식
4. 몸에 대한 그리스 로마인의 인식
5. 反할례 문화에 대한 유대인의 반응
6. 나가는 말
〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2010-911-002872016